Is $1 billion G-20 summit worth it?
http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/06/25/g20.g8.summits/index.html?iref=allsearch
Summary:
Was spending more than $1 billion worth the G-20 summit in
Connection
The connection that seem very obvious to me is the concept direct cost/opportunity cost. At the cost of over a $1 billion (direct cost) we lose an opportunity cost associated with this decision. Because every decision carries with it an opportunity cost, since in order to do one thing, something else must be sacrifice. In doing so we can’t use this money for other proposes like help homeless people in Canada , or improve our school education system. Another connection I made was that to scarcity. Scarcity is referring to anything that is available only in a limited supply. Money is definitely a limited supple. As Dr. Evil learned in the Austin Powers movies, $1 billion isn’t quite what it used to be. And the Canadian government seems to agree with that statement.
Reflection
It seems like the government is enjoying spending money. With over $1 billion price tag for the summit, I personally think that is way off the charts. Compare to the Winter Olympics 16 day budget of $1.8 billion for everyone in the British Columbia regions, its ridicules that the government spend over $1 billion for less than 100 people in only 10 days. However, even with all this bashing, I think I understand why they used all that money. If I had to guest why, it would be to kick start the economy. Canada has made great effort to advertise its country to attract/influence tourists to visit Canada . So in spending all this money we get the economy started. Similar, to what the united states are doing right now. (I could be wrong)
No comments:
Post a Comment